BlitzmaxBG

[Baggey]

So, My version of BlitzmaxBG now has:-

Select range case. Here is the working code.

Code Select Expand

num = 2

Select num

  Case 1..3
    Print "Low"

  Case 4..6
    Print "Mid"

  Default
    Print "Out"

End Select

Code Select Expand

Building case range test
Compiling:case range test.bmx
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 9
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 9
flat assembler  version 1.69.14  (1572863 kilobytes memory)
3 passes, 2870 bytes.
Linking:case range test.debug.exe
Executing:case range test.debug.exe
Low

Process complete

Its only taken about 5-6 years 

But got there in the end now im going to get rid of the back to front for eachin stuff.

Me thinks, im going to start modding the ide so it looks better a good dark theme. 

Kind Regards Baggey

[Baggey]

Now some more testing.

Code Select Expand

num=2

Select num

  Case 1..3, 2..4
    Print "Ambiguous?"

  Case 5..6
    Print "Upper"

  Default
    Print "Out"

End Select

Code Select Expand

Building case range test
Compiling:case range test.bmx
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 9
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 15
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 9
flat assembler  version 1.69.14  (1572863 kilobytes memory)
3 passes, 2898 bytes.
Linking:case range test.debug.exe
Executing:case range test.debug.exe
Ambiguous?

Process complete

NON Sequential jump

Code Select Expand

num=2

Select num

  Case 1..2, 5..6
    Print "Grouped range"

  Case 3..4
    Print "Mid skip"

  Default
    Print "Out"

End Select

Code Select Expand

Building case range test
Compiling:case range test.bmx
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 9
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 15
Lexer: recognized .. as T_DOTDOT at position 9
flat assembler  version 1.69.14  (1572863 kilobytes memory)
3 passes, 2912 bytes.
Linking:case range test.debug.exe
Executing:case range test.debug.exe
Grouped range

Process complete

Yeap, Definitely working a treat! 

[Baggey]

So i want to be able to type in C Directly now?

[Baggey]

So i want to be able to type in C Directly now?

With out all the needless squiggly brackets, semicolons, and ==, ||

I really feel like it got added and added to and the DEV's are just kicking the can down the road   

I do like the way FOR is setup in C.

So more of a hybrid between C and Max. Hmm Cmax.

So, BlitzmaxBG, was baggey for short but maybe that'l turn into BlitzmaxBC

Also, working on a nice Darktheme and icon changes.

im also adding microsecs() so it works as a normal keyword straight out of the box as well

Baggey

[Baggey]

Goto is coming back 

Dark IDE is coming along nicely!

Strange how things turn around in 5 or 6 years. I wanted things a bit different! Well, i Suppose you just have to learn how to do it, and do it yourself

Speed will be no slower but, it's Definatley going to be a little quicker.

Baggey

[Dabzy]

Strange how things turn around in 5 or 6 years. I wanted things a bit different! Well, i Suppose you just have to learn how to do it, and do it yourself

And when your really really really stuck, like, really really lemon squeezy stuck, give up and post a question, you usually figure it out within a minute!

Dabz

[Baggey]

Still working on my IDE. Think ive finally found a Bootstrap

Baggey

[wadmixfm]

Goto is coming back oooooooo heaven

Lee

[wadmixfm]

Or maybe use the keyword jump or jmp